Feb 12, 2025	Case: A77GXKE	Judge Vaccaro
Facts:	Police got a call about a suspicious vehicle on the side of the highway. When the trooper arrived, he saw the defendant's vehicle on the side of the highway. At the same time, the defendant was inside an ambulance being evaluated by paramedics. The road ranger told the trooper that the defendant was sitting the driver's seat when he arrived. Officers made contact with the defendant and noticed an odor of alcohol, lack of balance, and thick tongued speech. He also had red/bloodshot eyes. He refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .243 and .235 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress the lawfulness of the arrest. In our motion, we alleged that under Florida Statute 901.15, when there is no crash, an officer must observe every element of a misdemeanor crime "in their presence." Here, the officer did not observe the defendant driving or in actual physical control when he arrived (i.e., the first element of a DUI). A civilian road ranger is not an officer so the fellow officer rule does not apply. After conversations with the State about the legal issue, the DUI was Dismissed.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Feb 11, 2025	Case: 24-CT-011598	Judge Valkenburg
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failing to maintain a single lane (i.e. weaving). Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. He also had fumbling fingers and exaggerated movements. Alcohol was found all over the car. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .088 and .088 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Due to the .02 margin of error in the breath machine, we were able to place both breath results below the legal limit. After several negotiations regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 10, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502312	Judge Gonzalez
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving, running a red light, and having a defective headlight. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a disheveled look, she appeared confused, and had bloodshot eyes. Alcohol was found all over the car. The defendant performed very poorly on the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 10, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502019	Judge Gill
Facts:	Police responded to a call regarding a drunk pedestrian (i.e. the defendant) that was stumbling around the restaurant parking lot trying to find his car and opening random car doors. Officers arrived and parked behind the defendant who was now in the driver's seat of his car. Officers knocked on the window and he rolled it down in response to their command. They noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he appeared unsteady. The defendant stated he had drank two glasses of wine. He performed very poorly on field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, finger to nose, and one leg stand. The walk and turn was actually terminated due to safety concerns as the defendant almost fell over. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .170 and .164 in the breath machine. This was the defendant's Third DUI.
Defense:	Since the caller was anonymous, the officers needed to have some type of corroboration of the defendant's intoxication in order to lawfully seize him. Here, the unlawful seizure, without corroboration, was blocking his car in and ordering him to roll down his window. Officers observed nothing prior to their actions. After conversations with the State regarding the actions by police, they Dropped his Third DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 10, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502844	Judge Gonzalez
Facts:	The defendant crashed his car into a concrete light pole. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a sway to his stance. He also appeared unsteady, had bloodshot eyes, and dilated pupils. He refused to perform any roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	EMS was on scene and told the officers that the defendant appeared alert, oriented, answered all questions appropriately, and had a steady gait. This was all in contradiction to the officers' observations. In addition, the arresting officer stated that he conducted a DUI investigation, yet he never asked the defendant questions such as where he was coming from, where heading too, or if he even had a drink. He did not ask one question. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 5, 2025	Case: 24-CT-012794	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving and nearly striking a vehicle. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant stated that he had consumed several drinks prior to driving. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Many observations before and during the field sobriety tests written by the officer were contradicted by the video tape. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 5, 2025	Case: 24-CT-503201	Judge Paluck
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for having tinted windows too dark under Florida Law. Officers did not smell any alcohol, but noticed bloodshot eyes, an odor of burnt marijuana coming from the truck, bloodshot/watery eyes, and white foam on his lips. Believing that he was impaired by drugs, he was requested to perform field sobriety tests. He then performed the HGN (eye test), estimation of 30 seconds, finger to nose, walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. According to the officer, he performed poorly and was arrested for DUI. He later provided a urine sample which revealed positive results from FDLE for marijuana and cocaine. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	Even though he tested positive for nonprescribed illegal drugs, the State still must prove that he was impaired. On tape, none of the defendant's normal faculties were impaired. In fact, the arresting officer can be heard on tape stating that he needed a DRE (drug recognition expert) to be sure that the defendant was impaired by the drugs. Well, no DRE was ever called. So, if the cop is not sure, then how can a jury convict? After conversations with the State, they Dismissed the Defendant's Second DUI.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Feb 5, 2025	Case: 24-CT-018325	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end traffic crash. When officers arrived, they noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He also appeared confused, had a blank/dazed stare, exhibited poor balance, and had a lethargic appearance. He admitted to consuming a couple of beers. He refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the Defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 4, 2025	Case: 24-CT-502497	Judge Swett
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. She then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. She was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	The firm announced ready for trial. After negotiations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 4, 2025	Case: 24-CT-013096	Judge Scott
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving, making a wide turn into oncoming traffic, and running a stop sign. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and red/glassy eyes. After allegedly performing poorly on field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, and walk and turn, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the Defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 4, 2025	Case: 24-CT-002631CTAXMX	Judge Hitzemann
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant stated that she had consumed five drinks while working in the yard earlier in the day. The defendant refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test. This was her Second DUI.
Defense:	On tape, the defendant's speech sounded normal and not slurred. She had no balance issues and was very responsive and coherent. After negotiations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped her Second DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 30, 2025	Case: 24-CT-019490	Judge Bonavita
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol and he stated he had consumed two vodkas. He had bloodshot eyes and slurred speech. He performed poorly on the field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .207 and .194 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 30, 2025	Case: 23-CT-021608	Judge Bonavita
Facts:	Police dispatch was notified regarding a sick person passed out in a lane of travel. EMS found the defendant passed out in the car with it still in drive. Upon trying to awake the defendant, he tried to drive off with an EMS worker hanging on for almost 300 feet. Police arrived and noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. He refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	When the DUI officer arrived, the defendant was already detained in handcuffs. The firm took a pretrial deposition of the first officer on scene. He stated that he was not the one who cuffed the defendant and did not know the officer's name who did. The firm then raised an issue with the State that the defendant was unlawfully detained and cuffed for no reason as no-one could explain why he was in handcuffs prior the DUI officer's arrival.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 29, 2025	Case: 24-CT-018256	Judge Griner
Facts:	A named citizen called police and stated that the defendant was swerving all over the road and cut him off. Officers conducted a traffic stop and observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. After performing various field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew .189 and .182 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 28, 2025	Case: 24-CT-002821	Judge K. Roberts
Facts:	The defendant crashed his car into the center median and then a fence. There was heavy front-end damage to his car. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol and watery/glassy eyes. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Prior to trial, the firm pointed out to the State that on tape, his speech was normal, he was responsive and coherent, polite, and he had no balance issues. In addition, his field sobriety tests were much better on tape than as described in the police reports.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 23, 2025	Case: 24-CT-001584CTAXWS	Judge Swett
Facts:	Police were called to a McDonalds regarding drunk patron (i.e., the defendant). When police arrived, they came into contact with the defendant and smelled alcohol, observed slurred speech, and had an inability to walk without swaying. No one could find the keys to the car as the defendant had discarded them before the cops arrived. In a jail call later to his mother, he stated that he hid them. Officers went into McDonalds and saw the video of him behind the wheel. He refused to do roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Under Florida Statute 901.15, when there is no crash, an officer must observe every element of a misdemeanor crime "in their presence." Here, the officer did not observe the defendant driving or in actual physical control when he arrived (i.e., the first element of a DUI). Watching him on a McDonalds video is not in his presence. Thus, he did not observe the first element of DUI so the arrest was unlawful. After conversations with the State about the legal issue, the DUI was Dropped.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 23, 2025	Case: 24-CT-002005CTAXWS	Judge Grey
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving, drifting in his lane, rapidly accelerating, following too closely, and almost striking another car. Officers observed an odor of alcohol and he admitted to consuming four beers. He also had slurred speech, dry mouth, watery eyes, and he made unusual/inconsistent statements. He was also unsteady and swayed while he stood. After performing HGN (eye test), the walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the prosecutor regarding the defendant and the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 23, 2025	Case: 24-MM-002668MMAXWS	Judge Grey
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving and failing to maintain her lane. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and she was unsteady. She admitted to having drank alcohol and also stumbled. She refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She refused to get into the patrol car and was also charged with resisting an officer without violence. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, an officer must advise them of the adverse consequences for refusing. For example, the officer must state something like, "I am going to have base my decision to arrest you on what I have observed so far if you refuse." In addition, the officer can state to the defendant that their refusal can be used against them in court. If they do not give any adverse consequences, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer did not give the defendant any adverse consequences. After negotiations short of trial, the State Dropped the DUI and she received no conviction on the resisting charge.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 22, 2025	Case: 24-CT-011540	Judge Bagge-Hernandez
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end traffic crash. Witnesses stated that she was driving at a high rate of speed and cutting across lanes of traffic prior to the accident. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and watery eyes. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, she was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 22, 2025	Case: 24-CT-013463	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant drove up to officers as they were on an unrelated traffic stop/crash scene. Officers approached him and noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He also urinated on himself and had an unsteady stance. He refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped his Second DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.