Sep 13, 2013	Case: 2012-CT-01575-A-K	Judge Miller
Facts:	The defendant was stopped by the police for driving all over the road and almost hitting a sign. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, droopy eyes lids, and a sway. The defendant also stumbled and had to place his hand on his truck for balance. He refused to perform the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton were ready for trial.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 13, 2013	Case: 2012-CT-01575-A-K	Judge Miller
Facts:	The defendant was stopped by the police for driving all over the road and almost hitting a sign. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, droopy eyes lids, and a sway. The defendant also stumbled and had to place his hand on his truck for balance. He refused to perform the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton were ready for trial.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 12, 2013	Case: 2013-CT-000482	Judge Yerman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, glossy eyes,and slow movements. The defendant was then asked to perform the roadside tests to which he refused. He was then arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. It should be noted, this was the defendant's Third DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton were ready for trial. We pointed out to the State that the defendant was totally misinformed of the law as it related to taking or not taking the roadside tasks which was specifically written by the officer in his reports.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 12, 2013	Case: 11-020335MM10A	Judge Diaz
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for allegedly leaving the scene of an accident. Once stopped, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes as well as mumbled speech. In addition, the officer stated that the defendant was unsteady on his feet and had mood swings. During a conversation with the officer, the defendant allegedly stated that he just had another DUI. The front tire was flat and the damage to the car was consistent with hitting another vehicle. Subsequently, a DUI task force officer arrived and conducted an investigation. After observing the same signs of impairment, the DUI officer had the defendant perform field sobriety tests. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, one leg stand as well as the finger to nose, the defendant was arrested for DUI. This was the defendant's 2nd DUI. He was also charged with driving while license suspended as a result of the previous DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pre-trial motion to exclude evidence. In addition, while the initial officer stated that he heard the accident, he never actually saw the crash. Interestingly, the witness list never included the driver of the other vehicle. It was ultimately clear that the other driver was at fault and subsequently left the scene. The motion to exclude evidence was granted.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Sep 12, 2013	Case: 2013-CT-000482	Judge Yerman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, glossy eyes,and slow movements. The defendant was then asked to perform the roadside tests to which he refused. He was then arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. It should be noted, this was the defendant's Third DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton were ready for trial. We pointed out to the State that the defendant was totally misinformed of the law as it related to taking or not taking the roadside tasks which was specifically written by the officer in his reports.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 12, 2013	Case: 11-020335MM10A	Judge Diaz
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for allegedly leaving the scene of an accident. Once stopped, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes as well as mumbled speech. In addition, the officer stated that the defendant was unsteady on his feet and had mood swings. During a conversation with the officer, the defendant allegedly stated that he just had another DUI. The front tire was flat and the damage to the car was consistent with hitting another vehicle. Subsequently, a DUI task force officer arrived and conducted an investigation. After observing the same signs of impairment, the DUI officer had the defendant perform field sobriety tests. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, one leg stand as well as the finger to nose, the defendant was arrested for DUI. This was the defendant's 2nd DUI. He was also charged with driving while license suspended as a result of the previous DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pre-trial motion to exclude evidence. In addition, while the initial officer stated that he heard the accident, he never actually saw the crash. Interestingly, the witness list never included the driver of the other vehicle. It was ultimately clear that the other driver was at fault and subsequently left the scene. The motion to exclude evidence was granted.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Sep 10, 2013	Case: CT-6319-XEP	Judge Lefler
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol and blood-shot eyes. The defendant also admitted to having two drinks. According the officer, he exhibited clues of impairment on the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .138 and .132 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State, that on the video tape, the officer misinformed the defendant of the consequences of taking versus not taking a breath test. Based on the conversation between the officer and the defendant on video, the defendant then felt coerced into taking a breath test.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 10, 2013	Case: CT-6319-XEP	Judge Lefler
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol and blood-shot eyes. The defendant also admitted to having two drinks. According the officer, he exhibited clues of impairment on the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .138 and .132 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State, that on the video tape, the officer misinformed the defendant of the consequences of taking versus not taking a breath test. Based on the conversation between the officer and the defendant on video, the defendant then felt coerced into taking a breath test.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 9, 2013	Case: 4669-XEV	Judge Krieger-Martin
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol and blood-shot eyes. A bottle of Vodka was also found in the car. The defendant initially refused to perform the field sobriety tasks at the request of the officer. After a brief conversation with the officer, he then decided to do them. According to the officer, he failed them all and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pre-trial motion to suppress the field sobriety tests. In our motion, we alleged that the officer misstated the law and coerced the defendant into performing the tasks. The State conceded the motion after reading all the case law provided by the defense.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 9, 2013	Case: 4669-XEV	Judge Krieger-Martin
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol and blood-shot eyes. A bottle of Vodka was also found in the car. The defendant initially refused to perform the field sobriety tasks at the request of the officer. After a brief conversation with the officer, he then decided to do them. According to the officer, he failed them all and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pre-trial motion to suppress the field sobriety tests. In our motion, we alleged that the officer misstated the law and coerced the defendant into performing the tasks. The State conceded the motion after reading all the case law provided by the defense.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 4, 2013	Case: 13-CT-017363AXXX	Judge Johnson
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, mumbled speech, and red eyes. The defendant also stated she had drank two margaritas. The defendant was unsteady upon exiting the car and swayed while outside the car. According the officer, she failed the video taped roadside tests. After her arrest, she refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks and Braxton pointed out to the State that the entire video tape contradicted the officer's written allegations and observations.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 4, 2013	Case: 13-CT-012818AXXX	Judge Johnson
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and "delayed" speech. The defendant admitted to drinking beer and having a shot of Jack Daniels. According to the officer, he failed the video taped roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused to take the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton were ready for trial. We also pointed out to the State there was no sound on the video tape. Thus, nothing could be heard such as the defendant's speech, questions and answers by the officer to the defendant, the defendant's counting during the tasks, and the alphabet test.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 4, 2013	Case: 13-CT-017363AXXX	Judge Johnson
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, mumbled speech, and red eyes. The defendant also stated she had drank two margaritas. The defendant was unsteady upon exiting the car and swayed while outside the car. According the officer, she failed the video taped roadside tests. After her arrest, she refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks and Braxton pointed out to the State that the entire video tape contradicted the officer's written allegations and observations.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 4, 2013	Case: 13-CT-012818AXXX	Judge Johnson
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and "delayed" speech. The defendant admitted to drinking beer and having a shot of Jack Daniels. According to the officer, he failed the video taped roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused to take the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton were ready for trial. We also pointed out to the State there was no sound on the video tape. Thus, nothing could be heard such as the defendant's speech, questions and answers by the officer to the defendant, the defendant's counting during the tasks, and the alphabet test.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 3, 2013	Case: 9646-XEX	Judge Seraphin
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, blood-shot eyes, and a flushed face. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton attempted to pick a jury on the case to fight the charges but the panel was eventually stricken prior to being sworn. Afterwards, the firm again pointed out to the State that the officer had not written any specifics of the defendant's performance on the roadside tests and his reports were very vague.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 3, 2013	Case: 12-007125MM10A	Judge Solomon
Facts:	The defendant was stopped by the Florida Highway Patrol for weaving all over the roadway. This allegedly occurred numerous times over a few blocks. As the Trooper approached the car he observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, a flushed face and slurred speech. The defendant subsequently admitted to drinking. The defendant was asked to exit the vehicle. The Trooper observed that he was unsteady on his feet and swayed while he walked. The defendant performed 4 field sobriety tests including the HGN (eye test), walk and turn (9 steps up and back on a line), one leg stand as well as the finger to nose test. The defendant allegedly performed poorly on the tests and was arrested for DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton had a prior case with this Trooper whereby he admitted to falsifying a police report. Therefore, his credibility was suspect from the beginning of the case. In addition, the video failed to support all of the observations made by the Trooper.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 3, 2013	Case: 9646-XEX	Judge Seraphin
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, blood-shot eyes, and a flushed face. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton attempted to pick a jury on the case to fight the charges but the panel was eventually stricken prior to being sworn. Afterwards, the firm again pointed out to the State that the officer had not written any specifics of the defendant's performance on the roadside tests and his reports were very vague.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 3, 2013	Case: 12-007125MM10A	Judge Solomon
Facts:	The defendant was stopped by the Florida Highway Patrol for weaving all over the roadway. This allegedly occurred numerous times over a few blocks. As the Trooper approached the car he observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, a flushed face and slurred speech. The defendant subsequently admitted to drinking. The defendant was asked to exit the vehicle. The Trooper observed that he was unsteady on his feet and swayed while he walked. The defendant performed 4 field sobriety tests including the HGN (eye test), walk and turn (9 steps up and back on a line), one leg stand as well as the finger to nose test. The defendant allegedly performed poorly on the tests and was arrested for DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton had a prior case with this Trooper whereby he admitted to falsifying a police report. Therefore, his credibility was suspect from the beginning of the case. In addition, the video failed to support all of the observations made by the Trooper.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.