Mar 21, 2022	Case: 21-MM-003709	Judge D. Roberts
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving with her high beams on. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and she stated she had one beer. The defendant performed the HGN (eye test) and refused to perform any other field sobriety tests. She was arrested for DUI and later refused the breath test. Marijuana was found and she was also charged with possession.
Defense:	After several negotiations, we pointed out that on tape the defendant's speech was not slurred and she did not appear to be impaired. Thus, we pointed out that there was lack of probable cause to arrest her. The State Dropped the DUI and she also received no conviction in the possession charge.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 15, 2022	Case: 21-CT-003395	Judge Oster
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and failing to have her lights on. Once stopped, the officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. She then performed HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. She was then arrested for DUI. She later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The firm announced ready for trial. Prior to trial, we pointed out that on tape, her speech was not slurred at all. In addition, the video tape performance of her roadside tests clearly showed a lack of probable cause to arrest her.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Mar 15, 2022	Case: 21-CT-005909	Judge Oster
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failing to maintain a single lane, almost striking another car, and following too closely. He had an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he appeared unsteady. After performing various field sobriety tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	Many observations on the report were contradicted the video tape.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 15, 2022	Case: 21-CT-009500	Judge Oster
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving. Upon the stop of the defendant's car, the officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and he admitted to having consumed one drink. After performing roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The facts and circumstances surrounding the traffic stop were vague and lacked specificity. Thus, we called into question the lawfulness of the traffic stop.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 15, 2022	Case: 21-CT-003395	Judge Oster
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and failing to have her lights on. Once stopped, the officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. She then performed HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. She was then arrested for DUI. She later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The firm announced ready for trial. Prior to trial, we pointed out that on tape, her speech was not slurred at all. In addition, the video tape performance of her roadside tests clearly showed a lack of probable cause to arrest her.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Mar 15, 2022	Case: 21-CT-005909	Judge Oster
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failing to maintain a single lane, almost striking another car, and following too closely. He had an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he appeared unsteady. After performing various field sobriety tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	Many observations on the report were contradicted the video tape.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 15, 2022	Case: 21-CT-009500	Judge Oster
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving. Upon the stop of the defendant's car, the officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and he admitted to having consumed one drink. After performing roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The facts and circumstances surrounding the traffic stop were vague and lacked specificity. Thus, we called into question the lawfulness of the traffic stop.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 11, 2022	Case: 21-CT-018370	Judge Bonavita
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, glassy eyes, and he had mood swings. The defendant also exhibited a short attention span and was forgetful. The defendant only performed the HGN (eye tests) and walk and turn. He refused to perform all other tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .246 in the breath machine but failed to provide second sample so they called it a refusal.
Defense:	After several negotiations with the State about numerous issues in the discovery, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 11, 2022	Case: 21-CT-018370	Judge Bonavita
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, glassy eyes, and he had mood swings. The defendant also exhibited a short attention span and was forgetful. The defendant only performed the HGN (eye tests) and walk and turn. He refused to perform all other tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .246 in the breath machine but failed to provide second sample so they called it a refusal.
Defense:	After several negotiations with the State about numerous issues in the discovery, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 9, 2022	Case: AEBMBZE	Judge Komninos
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and dilated pupils. His speech was also slow, slurred, and mumbled. He performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .143 and a .142 in the breath machine.
Defense:	There were several inconsistencies in the discovery. After discussion with the prosecutor, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 9, 2022	Case: AEBM3HE	Judge Komninos
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/watery eyes, and depressed reflexes. He also had slow movements and dilated pupils. After performing roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .109 and a .107 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The defendant's performance on the field sobriety tests clearly showed that he may have been lower than the legal limit of .08 at the time of driving.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 9, 2022	Case: AEBMBZE	Judge Komninos
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and dilated pupils. His speech was also slow, slurred, and mumbled. He performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .143 and a .142 in the breath machine.
Defense:	There were several inconsistencies in the discovery. After discussion with the prosecutor, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 9, 2022	Case: AEBM3HE	Judge Komninos
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/watery eyes, and depressed reflexes. He also had slow movements and dilated pupils. After performing roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .109 and a .107 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The defendant's performance on the field sobriety tests clearly showed that he may have been lower than the legal limit of .08 at the time of driving.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 8, 2022	Case: 21-CT-007779	Judge Conrad
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving without headlights. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. There was the smell of spilled alcohol on the defendant's arm. He then performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .201 and a .192 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After several negotiations with the State and pointing out various contradictions between the reports and the video, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 8, 2022	Case: 21-CT-007779	Judge Conrad
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving without headlights. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. There was the smell of spilled alcohol on the defendant's arm. He then performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .201 and a .192 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After several negotiations with the State and pointing out various contradictions between the reports and the video, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 2, 2022	Case: 21-CT-010707	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant's vehicle was observed with front end damage. The officer got out of his car and went up to the defendant's car. The defendant was surrounded in the driver's seat by airbags that had deployed. The officer, after cutting through the airbags, observed an odor of alcohol and bloodshot eyes. He admitted to having drank alcohol. After performing roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .138 and a .133 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Due to a lack of an accident investigation, the firm was able to convince the State to Drop the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 2, 2022	Case: 21-CT-003009	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for having no taillights on. He was also weaving and straddling the lane markers. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and watery eyes. He then performed roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .141 and a .138 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After pointing out inconsistencies in the discovery, both in the reports and video, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 2, 2022	Case: 21-CT-003009	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for having no taillights on. He was also weaving and straddling the lane markers. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and watery eyes. He then performed roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .141 and a .138 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After pointing out inconsistencies in the discovery, both in the reports and video, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.